This portal has been archived. Explore the next generation of this technology.
Universal Inference Using the Split Likelihood Ratio Test
lib:1d1ac8056581c9a3 (v1.0.0)
Authors: Larry Wasserman,Aaditya Ramdas,Sivaraman Balakrishnan
ArXiv: 1912.11436
Document: PDF DOI
Abstract URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11436v2
We propose a general method for constructing hypothesis tests and confidence sets that have finite sample guarantees without regularity conditions. We refer to such procedures as ``universal.'' The method is very simple and is based on a modified version of the usual likelihood ratio statistic, that we call ``the split likelihood ratio test'' (split LRT). The method is especially appealing for irregular statistical models. Canonical examples include mixture models and models that arise in shape-constrained inference. %mixture models and shape-constrained models are just two examples. Constructing tests and confidence sets for such models is notoriously difficult. Typical inference methods, like the likelihood ratio test, are not useful in these cases because they have intractable limiting distributions. In contrast, the method we suggest works for any parametric model and also for some nonparametric models. The split LRT can also be used with profile likelihoods to deal with nuisance parameters, and it can also be run sequentially to yield anytime-valid $p$-values and confidence sequences.
ArXiv: 1912.11436
Document: PDF DOI
Abstract URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11436v2
We propose a general method for constructing hypothesis tests and confidence sets that have finite sample guarantees without regularity conditions. We refer to such procedures as ``universal.'' The method is very simple and is based on a modified version of the usual likelihood ratio statistic, that we call ``the split likelihood ratio test'' (split LRT). The method is especially appealing for irregular statistical models. Canonical examples include mixture models and models that arise in shape-constrained inference. %mixture models and shape-constrained models are just two examples. Constructing tests and confidence sets for such models is notoriously difficult. Typical inference methods, like the likelihood ratio test, are not useful in these cases because they have intractable limiting distributions. In contrast, the method we suggest works for any parametric model and also for some nonparametric models. The split LRT can also be used with profile likelihoods to deal with nuisance parameters, and it can also be run sequentially to yield anytime-valid $p$-values and confidence sequences.
Relevant initiatives
Related knowledge about this paper
Reproduced results (crowd-benchmarking and competitions)
Artifact and reproducibility checklists
- ACM/cTuning artifact appendix and reproducibility checklist
- NeurIPS reproducibility checklist
- SIGPLAN's checklist for empirical evaluation
- Collective Knowledge (organizing research projects based on FAIR principles)