Check the preview of 2nd version of this platform being developed by the open MLCommons taskforce on automation and reproducibility as a free, open-source and technology-agnostic on-prem platform.

Investigating the interaction between gradient-only line searches and different activation functions

lib:9aca44af892e652e (v1.0.0)

Authors: D. Kafka,Daniel. N. Wilke
ArXiv: 2002.09889
Document:  PDF  DOI 
Abstract URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09889v1


Gradient-only line searches (GOLS) adaptively determine step sizes along search directions for discontinuous loss functions resulting from dynamic mini-batch sub-sampling in neural network training. Step sizes in GOLS are determined by localizing Stochastic Non-Negative Associated Gradient Projection Points (SNN-GPPs) along descent directions. These are identified by a sign change in the directional derivative from negative to positive along a descent direction. Activation functions are a significant component of neural network architectures as they introduce non-linearities essential for complex function approximations. The smoothness and continuity characteristics of the activation functions directly affect the gradient characteristics of the loss function to be optimized. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the relationship between activation functions and different neural network architectures in the context of GOLS. We find that GOLS are robust for a range of activation functions, but sensitive to the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function in standard feedforward architectures. The zero-derivative in ReLU's negative input domain can lead to the gradient-vector becoming sparse, which severely affects training. We show that implementing architectural features such as batch normalization and skip connections can alleviate these difficulties and benefit training with GOLS for all activation functions considered.

Relevant initiatives  

Related knowledge about this paper Reproduced results (crowd-benchmarking and competitions) Artifact and reproducibility checklists Common formats for research projects and shared artifacts Reproducibility initiatives

Comments  

Please log in to add your comments!
If you notice any inapropriate content that should not be here, please report us as soon as possible and we will try to remove it within 48 hours!