We are very excited to join forces with MLCommons and OctoML.ai! Contact Grigori Fursin for more details!

Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillation

lib:d09bddf129d9a5e8 (v1.0.0)

Vote to reproduce this paper and share portable workflows   1 
Authors: Sarah Tan,Rich Caruana,Giles Hooker,Yin Lou
ArXiv: 1710.06169
Document:  PDF  DOI 
Artifact development version: GitHub
Abstract URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06169v4


Black-box risk scoring models permeate our lives, yet are typically proprietary or opaque. We propose Distill-and-Compare, a model distillation and comparison approach to audit such models. To gain insight into black-box models, we treat them as teachers, training transparent student models to mimic the risk scores assigned by black-box models. We compare the student model trained with distillation to a second un-distilled transparent model trained on ground-truth outcomes, and use differences between the two models to gain insight into the black-box model. Our approach can be applied in a realistic setting, without probing the black-box model API. We demonstrate the approach on four public data sets: COMPAS, Stop-and-Frisk, Chicago Police, and Lending Club. We also propose a statistical test to determine if a data set is missing key features used to train the black-box model. Our test finds that the ProPublica data is likely missing key feature(s) used in COMPAS.

Relevant initiatives  

Related knowledge about this paper Reproduced results (crowd-benchmarking and competitions) Artifact and reproducibility checklists Common formats for research projects and shared artifacts Reproducibility initiatives

Comments  

Please log in to add your comments!
If you notice any inapropriate content that should not be here, please report us as soon as possible and we will try to remove it within 48 hours!