Check the preview of 2nd version of this platform being developed by the open MLCommons taskforce on automation and reproducibility as a free, open-source and technology-agnostic on-prem platform.

Compression-Based Regularization with an Application to Multi-Task Learning

lib:e77a81b90a44f993 (v1.0.0)

Authors: Matías Vera,Leonardo Rey Vega,Pablo Piantanida
ArXiv: 1711.07099
Document:  PDF  DOI 
Abstract URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07099v1


This paper investigates, from information theoretic grounds, a learning problem based on the principle that any regularity in a given dataset can be exploited to extract compact features from data, i.e., using fewer bits than needed to fully describe the data itself, in order to build meaningful representations of a relevant content (multiple labels). We begin by introducing the noisy lossy source coding paradigm with the log-loss fidelity criterion which provides the fundamental tradeoffs between the \emph{cross-entropy loss} (average risk) and the information rate of the features (model complexity). Our approach allows an information theoretic formulation of the \emph{multi-task learning} (MTL) problem which is a supervised learning framework in which the prediction models for several related tasks are learned jointly from common representations to achieve better generalization performance. Then, we present an iterative algorithm for computing the optimal tradeoffs and its global convergence is proven provided that some conditions hold. An important property of this algorithm is that it provides a natural safeguard against overfitting, because it minimizes the average risk taking into account a penalization induced by the model complexity. Remarkably, empirical results illustrate that there exists an optimal information rate minimizing the \emph{excess risk} which depends on the nature and the amount of available training data. An application to hierarchical text categorization is also investigated, extending previous works.

Relevant initiatives  

Related knowledge about this paper Reproduced results (crowd-benchmarking and competitions) Artifact and reproducibility checklists Common formats for research projects and shared artifacts Reproducibility initiatives

Comments  

Please log in to add your comments!
If you notice any inapropriate content that should not be here, please report us as soon as possible and we will try to remove it within 48 hours!